 |
Whiplash and Other Useful Illnesses
Andrew Malleson, MB, BS, DPM,
MRCP, MRCPsych, FRCP(C)
McGill-Queen's University Press
|
| |
"Lawyers know the meaning of post hoc ergo propter hoc. Anything
that follows an accident is ipso facto post-traumatic. Malleson shows,
with dispatch and remarkable suppression of reasonable outrage, that most
of the time it should be post hoc ergo poppycock. To the litigants
lawyer, trauma is the smooth yellow highway to post-traumatic fibromyalgia
syndrome and post-traumatic stress disorder. The latter is a new diagnosis
on the menu of misery."-
Charles Godfrey,
Review - Literary Review of Canada
"Fascinating. The wit and humour of the prose and the insight
of the argument compelled me to read on. The specialist will benefit from
the concise discussions of diverse topics and the general reader will
find many gold nuggets of entertainment and information. Malleson is excellent
in his discussion of the numerous side-issues." Arthur Schafer,
Department of Philosophy, University of Manitoba -----
"An important and engaging book." Nortin M. Hadler,
MD FACP FACR FACOEM, Professor of Medicine and Microbiology/Immunology,
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
|
|
Whiplash, first described in a medical journal in 1953, now occurs so
frequently that in the U.S. alone its annual cost is estimated at between
$13 and $18 billion dollars. In Whiplash and the Exploitation of Victimhood
Andrew Malleson contends that whiplash is nothing more than a strain of
the neck and, like most other strains, heals in a matter of days or weeks.
The fact that up to 10% of all whiplash "victims" are reported
as permanently disabled occurs because medical healthcare and legal professionals
foster and create illnesses, dangling illusive fortunes in front of would-be
claimants.
Malleson details the evolution of whiplash from a common, short-lived
disorder into a world-wide epidemic that has left millions permanently
disabled. He exposes how some medical healthcare and legal professionals
prey on the anxieties and greed of their clients. He argues that whiplash
is only one of a long list of largely fabricated illnesses and injuries
that will drain resources from the health care system.
|
|
|
Editorial Reviews
From the New England Journal of Medicine, April 3, 2003
The term "whiplash" conjures up images of a violent encounter
between two automobiles, spider-webbed windshields, broken bones, and
twisted metal. In fact, whiplash claims are just as likely to result from
low-energy "bumper thumps" as they are from more destructive
collisions. Ten percent of persons who make whiplash claims report a substantial
permanent disability. So how can whiplash be considered a "useful"
illness? In Whiplash and Other Useful Illnesses, Andrew Malleson details
the evolution of whiplash, from its innocuous beginnings in 1928, when
Harold Crowe first used the term at a meeting of orthopedic surgeons to
describe eight cases of neck injury, to its present medicolegal standing,
which results in costs of $13 billion to $18 billion annually in the United
States. Spine specialists have long known that patients with secondary
gains -- workers' compensation claims or lawsuits -- have significantly
worse outcomes than those who do not. In fact, in scientific studies designed
to judge the efficacy of interventions, investigators must exclude such
patients or report their results separately. Of course, such considerations
are not limited to spine-related injuries. In a broad sense, Whiplash
and Other Useful Illnesses is about the way in which illnesses for which
patients may receive compensation are created and sustained for the benefit
of a few at the expense of many. Malleson chooses to write about whiplash,
the condition he has spent the most time researching and with which he
is most familiar. But his observations are applicable to a broad spectrum
of manufactured medicolegal illnesses. Malleson writes with a self-admitted
bias from years of working as a defense expert in legal cases involving
whiplash and other illnesses for which patients may be compensated. He
meticulously conveys his thesis in this thoroughly referenced and documented
book. The book includes 59 pages of chapter-by-chapter notations and 56
pages of references. In a somewhat tedious manner, Malleson initially
details the "junk science" that has given whiplash the status
of a legitimate (and thereby compensable) illness. A psychiatrist by training,
he particularly faults physicians for publishing poor scientific work
in an effort to advertise themselves as experts in the field. This advertising
allows them to secure an additional lucrative source of income in the
face of a contracting health care market. He points out the insidious
effort to legitimize the condition and discusses the interactions of medicine,
lawyers, and the media that create "epidemics" by taking advantage
of people's suggestible nature. Malleson draws parallels with other illnesses
that were "fashionable" in other periods, such as "railway
spine" and "repetitive strain injury," which reached nearly
epidemic proportions in other countries until laws allowing compensation
were rescinded. After the revocation of these laws, the ailments virtually
disappeared. Whiplash claims, however, continue to multiply relentlessly,
shifting vital resources and money away from where they are truly needed
within the health care system to the benefit of a select few "victims,"
doctors, and lawyers. Malleson faults this conspiracy for its role in
perpetuating the concept of whiplash as a form of prolonged disability.
He scathingly criticizes many subspecialties within medicine for jumping
on the "whiplash bandwagon" and perpetuating the pretense of
lasting harm in the face of what should be an innocuous event. His portrayal
of physicians as driven primarily by greed and self-interest under the
guise of their patients' best interests, however, appears to be unwarranted
and unsubstantiated. Lawyers are singled out for attempting to enrich
themselves by means of the "whiplash lottery" and simultaneously
allowing their clients to become professional patients who will not ultimately
be cured by the verdict. Furthermore, lawyers continually fight to maintain
the current adversarial system, which wastes valuable legal and health
care resources. Malleson believes that many patients use whiplash as a
convenient diagnosis to mask preexisting depression. It is socially more
acceptable to be the victim of another person than to admit to being depressed,
since depression comes from within. In this manner, an accident can be
viewed as a reputable and rewarding escape from a difficult situation.
Finally, Malleson faults insurance companies for not doing enough to combat
fraudulent claims, instead using the losses incurred to justify further
rate increases for all customers. Malleson's writing style is somewhat
dry, and the individual chapters do not seem to flow into one another,
making the reading slow and the book difficult to pick up at times. Nonetheless,
his thesis is credible and well substantiated. He provides the perspective
of someone who has spent many years of practice inside a medicolegal system
that he feels is fundamentally flawed and in need of immediate reform.
With the health care system in crisis, we can no longer afford expensive,
ineffective therapies that are often used only to meet an arbitrary minimal
monetary threshold for bringing suit or demonstrating long-term disability.
Malleson's repeated call for randomized clinical trials to substantiate
the efficacy of medical interventions is shared by most in the field of
medicine. Whiplash and Other Useful Illnesses isfor anyone involved with
persons seeking care or compensation for illness. Brian Grottkau, M.D.
Copyright © 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
The New England Journal of Medicine is a registered trademark of the MMS
|